Kommentare zu: Sparschreiber http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/ Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:53:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1878 Von: Lexikaliker http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-6737 Lexikaliker Wed, 02 Feb 2011 06:22:11 +0000 http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-6737 Stimmt! An den <a href="http://staedtler.de/triplus_micro.Staedtler">triplus micro</a> habe ich gar nicht gedacht. Im Gegensatz zu den beiden gezeigten ist er hier problemlos zu bekommen und hat außerdem einen ernstzunehmenden, nachfüllbaren Radie­rer sowie ein taschenfreundliches Minenführungsröhrchen. Stimmt! An den triplus micro habe ich gar nicht gedacht. Im Gegensatz zu den beiden gezeigten ist er hier problemlos zu bekommen und hat außerdem einen ernstzunehmenden, nachfüllbaren Radie­rer sowie ein taschenfreundliches Minenführungsröhrchen.

]]> Von: Magnus http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-6730 Magnus Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:49:31 +0000 http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-6730 Lt Webseite hat auch der STAEDTLER® triplus® micro nur einen kleinen Minenrest (dort sind 95% angebene) Lt Webseite hat auch der
STAEDTLER® triplus® micro
nur einen kleinen Minenrest (dort sind 95% angebene)

]]> Von: Lexikaliker http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-266 Lexikaliker Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:55:40 +0000 http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-266 Yes, it conserves lead. While a common mechanical pencil can't use the last 15 to 20 percent of the lead (this part is no longer held properly in axial direction) these double-clutch writing implements produce only 2.5 percent waste; this is a noticeable difference. The pencils with that mechanism are useful not only for more expensive lead but also for lead that breaks more easily (like the colour variants). The Pentel e-sharp (AZ125) pursues a similar goal. As far as I know the sleeve of this pencil is much closer to the clutch, making a continuous feed possbile. With this, the last part of the old lead is held in axial direction by the new one that follows. This reduces the lead waste to 3.5mm which is about 6 percent. Do you have some information about that Parker set you mentioned? Any detail is much appreciated. Yes, it conserves lead. While a common mechanical pencil can’t use the last 15 to 20 percent of the lead (this part is no longer held properly in axial direction) these double-clutch writing implements produce only 2.5 percent waste; this is a noticeable difference. The pencils with that mechanism are useful not only for more expensive lead but also for lead that breaks more easily (like the colour variants).

The Pentel e-sharp (AZ125) pursues a similar goal. As far as I know the sleeve of this pencil is much closer to the clutch, making a continuous feed possbile. With this, the last part of the old lead is held in axial direction by the new one that follows. This reduces the lead waste to 3.5mm which is about 6 percent.

Do you have some information about that Parker set you mentioned? Any detail is much appreciated.

]]> Von: Germ http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-265 Germ Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:21:25 +0000 http://www.lexikaliker.de/2008/06/sparschreiber/#comment-265 The Parker set I had, it's pencil mechanism was exactly like this. The jaws extended out from the tip. I guess it would conserve lead, wouldn't it? The Parker set I had, it’s pencil mechanism was exactly like this. The jaws extended out from the tip. I guess it would conserve lead, wouldn’t it?

]]>