<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2773" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Yasutomo &#38; Co. 1967</title>
	<link>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 23:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2773</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Von: Lexikaliker</title>
		<link>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexikaliker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 07:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Kiwi-d, thank you for your comments.

You're right, it is very difficult to find adverts of this kind; I was lucky to grab that one at eBay but the seller didn't mention the source in detail (just "from a 1967 publication"). The reverse shows a small part of an advert with the letters "arch" so it might have been a magazine targeted at architects.

I take it as 0.001mm (which is equivalent to 0.2%) but I have problems to rate that claim, mainly because I don't know the details of the manufacturing process and the dimensional stability of polymer leads.

I'm happy to hear that I was able to gazump you ;-) I'll soon try it with another advert from 1968 :-)

I am eager to see what your blog will show in a week or two!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kiwi-d, thank you for your comments.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, it is very difficult to find adverts of this kind; I was lucky to grab that one at eBay but the seller didn&#8217;t mention the source in detail (just &#8222;from a 1967 publication&#8221;). The reverse shows a small part of an advert with the letters &#8222;arch&#8221; so it might have been a magazine targeted at architects.</p>
<p>I take it as 0.001mm (which is equivalent to 0.2%) but I have problems to rate that claim, mainly because I don&#8217;t know the details of the manufacturing process and the dimensional stability of polymer leads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to hear that I was able to gazump you ;-) I&#8217;ll soon try it with another advert from 1968 :-)</p>
<p>I am eager to see what your blog will show in a week or two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Kiwi-d</title>
		<link>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwi-d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3191</guid>
		<description>One question - where was this advert published? Magazine, newspaper, catalogue...? How did you find it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One question - where was this advert published? Magazine, newspaper, catalogue&#8230;? How did you find it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Kiwi-d</title>
		<link>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwi-d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.lexikaliker.de/2010/02/yasutomo-co-1967/#comment-3190</guid>
		<description>Excellent posting.
It seems surprisingly difficult to find adverts from the very early days of 0.5mm.
The 1/1000 claim is interesting. That would be +/-0.0005mm, or pehaps they meant to 0.001mm or perhaps even they meant 1/1000th of an inch considering the US is non-metric. Personally I find all those claims a bit hard to believe for something as variable as a stick of graphite. Still, who knows?
Ahhhhh, you have gazumped me again! See my blog in a week or two and you will know why :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent posting.<br />
It seems surprisingly difficult to find adverts from the very early days of 0.5mm.<br />
The 1/1000 claim is interesting. That would be +/-0.0005mm, or pehaps they meant to 0.001mm or perhaps even they meant 1/1000th of an inch considering the US is non-metric. Personally I find all those claims a bit hard to believe for something as variable as a stick of graphite. Still, who knows?<br />
Ahhhhh, you have gazumped me again! See my blog in a week or two and you will know why :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

